Moritz Baumann vs Tim Ruehl Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L L L W L
Form
L W L W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Baumann 1 - 0 Ruehl
They have played 2 sets in total, with Baumann winning 2 and Ruehl winning 0. The last match between Baumann and Ruehl was at the Switzerland F1, 09-03-2015, First, Carpet with Moritz Baumann getting the victory 7-6(8) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Moritz Baumann | 1 |
| Tim Ruehl | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(8) 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Moritz Baumann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(5) 3-4 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Bastian Trinker
Player
Moritz Baumann
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Moritz Baumann
Player
Mathieu Meyer
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Moritz Baumann
Player
Pietro Licciardi
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maxime Hamou
Player
Moritz Baumann
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Ruehl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Tim Ruehl
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Tim Ruehl
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Matei Cristian Onofrei
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Stuart Parker
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elgin Khoeblal
Player
Tim Ruehl
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Dax Donders
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
121)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
121)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Marlon Vankan
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
105)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Tim Ruehl
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Noah Lopez
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Tim Ruehl
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-0 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (153/108) | Win/Loss | 54% (58/49) |
| 59% (340/241) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (132/117) |
| 54% (2955/2529) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1183/1100) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 269 | Aces Total | 81 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 188 | Total Double Faults | 132 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:4:20 |
| 648.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 350.27 |
| 56% (2100/3758) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2380/3944) |
| 73% (1541/2100) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1484/2380) |
| 51% (843/1658) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (717/1564) |
| 47% (178/382) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (184/407) |
| 41% (1504/3679) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1598/3815) |
| 60% (152/254) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (57/105) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (33/73) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (12/25) |
| 49% (30/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 86% (160/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (52/47) |
| 13% (160/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (52/5) |
| 17% (101/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (55/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
